16 NOV | Help Needed-Hair Discrimination In the MilitaryPosted: November 16th, 2007By: Treasured Locks |
Here is the email we received from Kim’s mother:
Hi,
thank you for responding. i am the proud parent of a daughter who is serving in the military. as you know the regulation clearly states no dreadlocks in uniform. i nor she has never have considered her hair as being dreadlocks. her hair was started off by coil twists and she has been cornrowing her hair in uniform. my daughter needs the support from as many haircare specialists as possible to convey to her commander (to whom it my concern) that she does not have dreadlocks and the difference between the two. attached are some pictures of her and how she wears her hair in uniform. my daughter is being threatened with a dishonorable discharge after 7 years of being in the air force because of this prejudicial regulation that came into effect a year ago. at first her commander said that she could wear them in a neat and professional manner and just recently all of that changed. please help if you can. if you have any questions please let me know. if you could push these pictures out and bring awareness to the subject though your site or anyway that you can…i think that the public needs to be aware of the underlying prejudice and discrimination that still remains in the military. first black people were not allowed to wear afro’s until people fought that, then cornrows were considered unprofessional until change finally came, now dreadlocks…and white people’s hairstyles have never been attacked or even questioned, why is that?
We are certainly not experts on military regulations concerning hair. We did a little research and found out the regulation Kim’s mother is referring to is 36-2903 Dress and appearance regulation on the wear of woman’s hair in uniform. However, we do understand something about personal hygiene and natural Black hair. We understand the desire for soldiers to keep a neat, professional appearance. And, we support that. Apparently, there was a recent change in the military code that banned “dreadlocks”. As far as we know there is no clear definition in the code as to what constitutes “dreadlocks”. This may be a “we’ll know it when we see it” rule. However “dreadlocks” are no longer authorized in uniform in the Air Force. We have no idea why the military would make such a regulation or what they consider “dreadlocks”. Locks (we hate the term dreadlocks) can be created in several different ways. Yes, locks can look unkempt and can be dirty. We can understand why those would be forbidden. But, the idea that all locked hair is like that shows how far we have to go to educate people on natural Black hairstyles. Most people who allow their hair to lock, in modern times, wear it very neat and clean. Techniques such as the one Kim has used have left her with a neat, clean, manageable hair style. Kim’s hairstyle is functional (not in the way), professional looking and neat. Kim’s locks were created by coil twists which are neat and uniform (pun intended). She keeps them cornrowed while in uniform. Cornrows are allowed in the Air Force (the code that allows them is below). We would consider her hair cornrowed. Look at the pictures. The coils are very small and neatly arranged into cornrows. What difference does it make that the hair is coiled before being cornrowed? Her hairstyle, for all practical purposes, is the same as any white woman or black woman with permed hair pulled up in a bun. We don’t need to tell you that. You can see the pictures. Kim has been told was told she would have to “wash out” her twists. Interlocked black hair doesn’t simply “wash out”. Because of the unique coiled structure of our hair and the rough texture, when the hair is left in a bound state for a period of time, the hair begins to weave itself together. The resulting “lock” is is not easily removed. Unfortunately, it appears the commanders in the squadron have educated themselves on the Internet and read about how people with locked straight hair can wash theirs out. That simply is not true for African hair types. Removing the coils once they have been left in the hair for so long becomes very tedious, at best. And, forcing Kim to change her hairstyle which is both attractive and practical would place a burden on her to find another style for her natural hair. It’s not like most people with African hair can just pull it up in a bun like White people can. Kim needs the coil twists to make her hair manageable enough to keep in the bun style. The military is leaving soldiers like Kim with very few options: cut your hair, perm your hair or wear a wig seems to be what they are saying. Locked styles like Kim’s and styles like SisterLocks allow many people with natural hair to wear it in styles they would otherwise not be able to wear. Kim should not be forced to find another way to wear her hair. Just how do the commanders in the military expect Black female soldiers to wear their hair? Are they trying (consciously or unconsciously) to force them to use chemical straightening? We have been told women in Kim’s position have been asked “Why don’t you just perm your hair?” and “Is your hair that important to you?” or “Why don’t you just wear a wig?” It’s unconscionable that in the year 2007 a Black woman who want to wear her natural is still being asked these questions.
We are happy to add our voice to those asking that the military reconsider this case in particular and this regulation, in general. As we understand the regulation, it would appear to be discriminatory against natural African-American hairstyles, without good cause. It’s clear to us that in the case of Kim it is an unnecessary regulation. Her hair is in no way a distraction, a detriment to her performing her duties or a danger to her or anyone else. What other possible reason could the military have for banning her hair style?
What can you do?
- Immediately, what we need is people with black hair care expertise to explain to Kim’s commanders why her hair style should be allowed. We are collecting emails that we will forward to Kim. If you have expertise in black hair care, please send an email to us explaining why you feel Kim’s hair style should be allowed.
- Secondly, we need to let our representatives in Congress know that we do not approve of the military discriminating against natural Black hair. The regulation is unnecessary and puts an undue burden on our female soldiers. Treasured Locks has prepared a petition that you can sign. Just click on the link and you can craft a letter to your representatives in Congress letting them know how you feel. Better yet, we recommend you send a personal email to your Congressional representatives. You have two Senators and a Congressman. Using this site, you can easily send an email to all three. It’s best that the email be in your own words. But, here’s an idea to get you started.
- Spread the word. It’s called viral marketing. Send a copy of this web page to your friends and ask them to not only sign the petition but send a copy to their friends. If you feel this policy is unfair, speak out about it and empower others to do the same.
- Email Kim with your support. While we want to speak out about this code in general, it’s also important to support Kim right now as this is the case that was brought to our attention by her mother. Kim needs our support immediately. Send an email to us with Attn: Kim in the subject and we’ll get it to Kim.
If you need an idea on what words to use in your email to your Congressmen and Senators, you can start with something like this:
It has come to my attention that the United States Air Force has a regulation, AFI36-2903 DRESS AND PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF AIR FORCE PERSONNEL, which in part discriminates against African-American women serving in the Air Force. The code bans a common natural African-American hairstyle, which the Air Force has called “dreadlocks”. Female personnel with neat, clean, professional well-kept hair are being forced to choose between cutting their hair and treating it with chemicals to conform with this regulation which I feel unfairly and unnecessarily discriminates against African-Americans. The regulation itself does not define “dreadlocks” This leaves women with hair that is in no means a distraction or a detriment to their duties, subject to disciplinary action. I think the code was fine before the addition of the ban on “dreadlocks” and the addition of that ban is unnecessary. The code already states that hairstyles cannot be “faddish” and must be professional. Locked hair is not necessarily faddish nor is it necessarily unprofessional.
While it is certainly reasonable that the Air Force require its personnel to wear their hair in a neat and professional manner, blanket regulations against a loosely defined manner of wearing the hair is causing undue hardship on a number of women in the Air Force. There appears to be an ignorance of the needs of African-American hair and what can be done in the way of styling the hair without either cutting it off or subjecting the hair to chemicals. Wearing the hair in a “locked” style is the only way many African-American women can wear their hair, with any length, and without having to chemically treat it or wear a wig. As long as the styles are neat, professional looking, not distracting and not hindering their ability to perform their duty, there is no reason the Air Force should require women to change their hair styles.
I would like to request that you look into this regulation and ask the Air Force to reconsider the ban of neat, clean and professional hairstyles worn by African-American women.
The regulation states (the link will take you to the latest copy we could find):
Hair Style (Women) styled to present a professional appearance. Allow the wear of conservative hairpins, combs, headbands, elastic bands and barrettes. Hair pins and bands must match hair color. Long hair will be secured with no loose end. (see note 8.) Bangs, if worn, will not touch the eyebrows. Braids, micro-braids and cornrows are authorized. However, must be solid color similar to the individual’s hair color; conservative and not present a faddish appearance be worn in an extreme or fad style or violate safety requirements, extend below any side of an invisible line drawn parallel to the ground at the bottom edge of the shirt collar regardless of length. Length will not be excessive, include hair ornaments such as ribbons, beads, jeweled pins, or hair scrunchy. May not have shaved heads, military high-and-tight or flat top haircuts. (Ban on faddish styles and cuts.) Will not prevent proper wear of headgear, including helmet or chemical mask. Synthetic hair not authorized when not permitted by safety/mission requirements. Dreadlocks are not authorized.
NOTE: Minimum length/bulk required is 1 inch not to exceed 3 inches in bulk and will not prevent proper wear of headgear, including helmet or chemical mask. (See note 3 & 7).
We find it interesting that the code states a minimum bulk or length for female airmen. Apparently, they are interested in them maintaining a feminine appearance. Yet, bulk cannot exceed 3 inches (probably for safety reasons). And, cornrows, braids and microbraids are specifically authorized in the code. Remember that Kim’s hair is coil-twisted, then corn-rowed. What do you think? Let’s hear from you.
If you’d like to discuss this in a format a little better suited for conversation, join us here
November 15th, 2007 at 4:50 am
I know Kim personally and this issue all too well. I too am an Uncle.Sam.Action.Figure serving my country. I was FORCED to cut my LOCS in Sep ‘06, a month after this new “regulation” was established and after 5 years of growing them. I fought it and received paperwork and threats of being discharged as well. I tried to explain to them that I had LOCS and not DREADLOCKS (I hate that word, too). DREADLOCKS are matted ropes of hair which are created through free forming…i.e no comb, no grooming, no maintenance. My LOCS were created with two-strand twists. I performed maintenance on my hair to ensure it was always neat and professional. It was a hard decision, but I had to weigh my options and my decision is something I battle with daily. I can honestly say, my hair was my strength and being forced to cut it was stressful mentally and emotionally. I still get depressed thinking about it. The one thing that bothers me is that if it presents a professional image, why is it such an issue? Its ok for me to buy hair and get cornrows, but I can’t achieve basically the same style with my own hair that naturally locs? Right now, I have yarn twists…and folks say, “oh you hair looks good…they almost like dreads.” Hmmmmmm… As stated in the editorial, the problem is the folks passing these regs are not educated on the different styles and classifications of black hair. Some folks have been lucky to still grow/have their locs and I commend Kim on addressing this issue and trying to establish new standards or atleast a better understanding of LOCS. As she stated, and as past history shows…as the hairstyles change and evolve, so do the mindsets of the people. But in this situation, we can’t wait for evolution…we need a RESOLUTION. I hope this regulation gets revised. WE ARE A MOVEMENT BY OURSELVES, BUT A FORCE WHEN WE ACT TOGETHER! Let’s educate and change!
November 16th, 2007 at 4:18 am
I am appalled. She is my best friend, and I am disgusted by what’s happening to her. There are so many other more important issues that need to be addressed in the military other than if her hair is “dread”locked or not. If we really look at it, it is neatly managed, cornrowed on top, and a bun in the back. There is no reason for enforcing this regulation on her or for the outright discrimination. There are several women in the military with this hairstyle, some are “getting away with it” and some are being told to shave their heads. If you saw her standing in front of you in uniform, with her hair as is shown in the picture, what would you think? That she is totally sloppy and has no professionalism about her? I think not! She looks neat, has a good military bearing, and keeps her hair well-kempt. There should be some standards for wearing hair in locs, but to totally disregard all possibilities, and force the shaving of heads for all locked hair is an outrage! If she’s not got her hair all over her head, falling down in her face, freely hanging down her back, then what’s the problem? Most wouldn’t even recognize them as locs, but twists or braids instead. Is this pettiness what we have come to?
Thank you for posting this blog and giving others the chance to voice their opinions. Hopefully things will change one day for women of color in the military. We keep getting targeted for natural beauty. No afros- now we can wear them; then, no cornrows- finally, they’re allowed;, and now no locs. Perhaps this too will change. But until it does, are we going to have to lose good military Soldiers, Airmen, Sailors, and Marines to such nonsense? Please help by sending letters to your Congressmen. I’ve sent a few to the MD Senators, but have had no replies. If more come in, there’s a chance we can help all the women in the military who have natural hairstyles and beauty.
Just a thought…
November 16th, 2007 at 6:44 pm
Wow! With all the problems this world is face with the only thing the military can find to try and put a quick fix to is how the women in the service should wear their hair? My best friend “JAI” did have a hard time coping with the loss of her hair. And like she stated, is something she deals with everyday. For a long time this military has only been for the white man and after all the strong airmen (Tuskegee Airmen) before us went thru to make a change, what’s really changed? Hair must be above the collar, hair must be a natural color, head bands must be the same color as your hair!!! I mean, who really cares? Why aren’t they discharging those dirt bag airmen who comes to work with their uniforms right out of a duffle bag? Or the ones who aren’t doing what’s expected of them, like their JOBS! Oh let’s not forget about the ones that have been in 18+ years and couldn’t walk a mile if you gave them a week to do it, because they don’t meet the weight requirements and haven’t taken or passed a PT test since they’ve been administering them? In the pictures, “KIM” looks as professional as an airman can look. How many black people where involved with the revised this regulation? How many were questioned about the in’s and out’s of black folk’s hair? You’re right, probably NONE. Come on people open your eyes, this needs to be dealt with cause they are losing some of the best airmen this military has!
To Kim, I applaud you for standing up for what’s right! And to all the rest who are taking a stand also!
November 16th, 2007 at 8:18 pm
I am caucasian, but I have hair of very similar texture to African American hair. So I get a lot of tips from my African American friends. I know how hard it is to manage kinky hair and from the pictures it appears Kim has done very well. Her cornrows are not unkempt. They look very professional. But I know that the government has the right to draw a line somewhere. Even men are required to get haircuts when they enter the military. But I just wanted to say Kim’s hair looks very nice.
November 19th, 2007 at 4:19 am
Usually i’m very analytical, but on this subject i’m stuck only because I am quite simply appalled. It seems if it’s not one thing it’s another, and after that…it’s another, when will it end. When will we take a stand and or come to the aid of thoughs in need. Why do we keep allowing our brothers and sisters to be discriminated against, and run all over. We need to if nothing else at least open up out mouths and pass on the word and tell the story, let it be known. Kim, I love and support you girl, thank you for being strong enough to stand for thoughs who feel they can’t!
November 20th, 2007 at 9:23 am
It is great to know that we back each other up when we have challenges like this. I wouldn’t have known what to do in that situation, but now i do.
November 20th, 2007 at 9:28 am
Kim needs a lawyer. Similar restrictions concerning African-Americans have been challenged before, successfully. I will contact her and let her know how to get help.
November 20th, 2007 at 9:37 am
How dare congress continue to discriminate against afro hair. I am a beautiful black woman with long flowing LOCS and many years ago I considering going into the Army but changed my mind because I knew that the government would interfere with my crown of glory. I can not nor will I tolerate anyone telling me how to wear my hair. It’s just a real evil way to make someone submit to a culture that is against their own values and choices. I really dont like the this garbage. And how can anybody discriminate against another race for how God made them? I mean do people go around discriminating against white people for not having pigment? I hair is a symbol of strength. God made it tough cause we are tough. God made it strong because we are strong. THere is nothing “unruly” about hair that is designed to protect our scalp from the sun and keep us cool in the heat. All races come from Africa. I people come from Africa. So the hatred of the state of blackness is due larger issues around “inferiority complexes”…
Ok nuff said…sista girl is out…Peace ya’ll
November 20th, 2007 at 9:46 am
I am also in the Air Force and I am wearing my hair natural but I do not allow it to lock. I wear my natural hair in braids or double strand twists and take them down every four to six weeks and get them retwisted or rebraided. I have not encountered any problems with this method. I believe the problem lies in allowing the hair to lock which is what I think Kim has done. I guess that is what the Air Force considers dreadlocks.
November 20th, 2007 at 9:48 am
Hey girl I am in the Air Force too and I know the drama that can come about because of the way we wear our hair. I do my cornrows myself and other hairstyles. My base is much more laid back than others so I dont get harrassed about my hair (besides if they start looking at me cross or asking too many questions I will take their ass to MEO and file a suit against them all the way to the IG). Discrimination is discrimination and I have read the AFI and that part about our hair is extremely broad on certain things. We can not have out hair be more than 3 inches in bulk, but how do you measure that? It must be neat and professional in appearance, but where is that defined? The problem is it is left up to interpretation of the individual(s) reading the reg at each base and not standard across the board. There is nothing wrong with your appearance and you have rights, and can fight them. You may be thinking small potatoes if you have not gone to the MEO or IG yet. They are your resources and will fight for you. Check into it.
November 20th, 2007 at 9:51 am
Hi.
I’ve been natural for about 8 months now, and although it was hard at first from letting go of years of perm, wigs, weaves, braids and hat cover ups, I actually do feel set free, from a society that doesn’t accept the natural beauty of black hair and embrace what God has blessed me with.
Kim’s hair looks very nice and professional. I love the look of clean strong looking locks. It shows empowerment, and a crown of glory to me.
It’s a shame that the quote on quote “land of the free,” is still imprisoned by the lack of knowledge of hair of color, or is it that they do not want to accept that the world is a diverse planet of many colors, with different textures of hair? Who knows. I pray that this world will change their hearts and attitudes towards others and don’t judge by the cover, but by the content.
PLB
Elvia
November 20th, 2007 at 10:05 am
Kim’s hair is PROFESSIONAL and NEAT.
This is dicrimination against ETHNICITY and DIVERSITY.
November 20th, 2007 at 10:52 am
I’m not familiar with all the legalities, but I personally don’t see anything wrong with this young lady’s hair style. It is neat and professional in nature. With everything this country has to deal with, I’m appauled at the fact that this young lady could be dishonorably discharged because of her hair!
November 20th, 2007 at 10:55 am
They need to realize we don’t have “wash and wear” hair like they do. This braided, twisted style keeps her hair neat and care free so she can concentrate on doing her job and serving our country, something THEY need to concentrate on rather than discriminate against our texture of hair, not every black woman wants to perm their hair straight in order to look like our European counterparts. We are NOT European, we are African American, it should be ok for our hair to reflect that. If they discharge her for her style, maybe they should discharge others for wearing ponytails, chignons, and haircolor. This case seriously reminds me of the Imus discriminatory remark. Like the others said, her hair is NEAT and PROFESSIONAL, locs can be neat and professional also, this is the way our hair was MEANT to be.
November 20th, 2007 at 10:56 am
Hi, I am natural and I am an warrant officer in the Army. AR 670-1 is the regulation that governs how to wear the hair. Kim, I feel your pain. For years I have stuggled with trying to stay “within the regulation” as well as be an individual. If you try to explain to them why you are natural, they will look at it like a fad. You have to look at it from within the military realm. So, the best thing for you to do is to use your 7 yrs of service to combat any questions that come up about your professionalism. A court-martial is serious. Do you remember when your command told you that you they were okay with your hair style? Start doing Memorandums For Record (MFR). Start with when the command ok’d your hair style and go from there. The reg. is not going to change over night. I have been in the military for 13yrs and if anything, they are becoming more restictive about the styles that we can wear. Also, one of the things that they may try to get you on is head gear fit as well as gas mask fit. If you can wear them without having to buy a bigger size then you should be good. If your bun sticks out, try to put your hair in a french braid that is above your collar. Get a lawyer. How long have you been coiling your hair? Use that to your advantage. Why now after 7 yrs of service is it a problem. Your chest is full of ribbons. Use that. The various schools that you have been to, training, and your hair has not stopped you from being a professional. Do you receive regular performance ratings or counselings? Use those as well. You can fight the court-martial but again the reg. will not change over night. What you have to do is use there words to your advantage ie, couselings, awards etc. We understand why we are natural, remember they do not. If they are constantly on you about formations, watching you like a hawk etc. Play the game. Don’t argue with them. They will use that to fuel the fire. Now that the spot light is on you, show them how much of a professional that you are. It may sound like I am siding with the AF, believe me, I am not. I just understand oh too well how the game is played and how they will use every method that they can to try and rattle you.
Be encouraged.
November 20th, 2007 at 11:14 am
Hi,
Going natural is new for us, you can not expect for society to just jump on the band wagon. It is going to take some time. This is just another fight to be fought. White society has seen natural black hair as militant and defiant. This is from a lack of understanding.
November 20th, 2007 at 11:31 am
As a professional that also wears her hair natural, I find it apalling that her hair-do is causing a disturbance. Kim’s hair is beautiful and very neat. What is the problem of her accusers? God did not intend for everyone to look the same….if he did, all would die from the monotony. This country gives us the right to freedom of expression; I thought it did.
Stay strong my sister!!!!!
November 20th, 2007 at 11:33 am
I agree with Paula. I am a black female in the Army and we have the same regulation as the Air Force. I am not sure what the Air Force dons during training exercises, but your hairstyle should not affect the where of the combat helmet (cevlar). It looks to me that her bun may be too big for her helmet to fit comfortably on her head to provide adequate protection. If you are going to get twists, just don’t allow your hair to lock. I think everything will work itself out. Hang in there.
November 20th, 2007 at 11:49 am
I am a specialist in the United States Army. I am so glad someone has made it their business to address this issue. Even though I am in a unit where they are more leniant when it comes to our hairstyles, individuals in the Army will see our ethnic hairstlyes as “not in regulation.” They just dont understand that we have a different grade and texture of hair. I am currently in Iraq and have been here for a year already. I have been natural for a year know and I must admit that it hasnt been a real easy road to begin. I do still get my hair cornrowed because my hair grows faster- even though i dont get perms. My hair used to be alot thicker and longer, but i had a weave in my hair and my mother accidently cut the thread and each cornrow in half!!! I was like… that was when I was 17 and now im 20 so now I’m still recovering from that and the fact that I’m natural. I will say that most of it is natural, but the permed ends are still shedding. God forbid they said I couldnt wear cornrows at all. We would have a serious problem!!
November 20th, 2007 at 12:05 pm
Tawana, Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I sent my letters to Congress and signed the petition. This is blatant discrimination against black people.
Fly Sista Girl said it all..And how can anybody discriminate against another race for how God made them?
The USAF needs to be called out for their actions. Being an Air Force kid myself, I KNOW there are more important issues to tackle than hair.
Kim, stay strong, stand your ground and know that people are backing you up. You are in my prayers. Be blessed.
November 20th, 2007 at 12:21 pm
This is not right i mean Kim should be able 2 wear her hair the way she wants.Especially since she is risking her life for our coutry the beloved U.S.A. They really need 2 make some changes at the top cause this is unacceptable 2 treat our men and women like this,Kim stand firm and see that God move. I pray that all works out concerning this matter. Peace, Shi
November 20th, 2007 at 12:41 pm
Kim’s hair is neat. I’ve been natural for 5 months now. After I did the big chop, my family freaked out and we’re black! It’s our hair and we think that it looks bad. Be encouraged Kim, your hair looks really good. It takes one person to stand up for a whole group of people. When one breaks through, others can follow. Your hair is beautiful!.
-Sharon
November 20th, 2007 at 12:48 pm
That’s sad. This young lady look neat. They need to worry about the work she does not her hair. I would say something if her hair was smelling, or it look dirty but, it’s clearly discrimination because it look neat, beautiful.
She is in my prayers and so are they GOD can and will solve this problem.Let’s all turn it over to JESUS and stop worrying about it. JESUS will if we let HIM. GOD bless you.
November 20th, 2007 at 12:55 pm
Instead of praising her and thanking her for serving our country, she gets “disciplined”? Ridiculous. Please know it is not only black women who find the militaries actions appalling. As women we need to stand up for all of our rights.
November 20th, 2007 at 12:57 pm
I was in the Air Force 25 yrs ago. There wasn’t an issue regarding locs that time…It was cornrows. They considered them a “FAD” and not within the Air Force regulations for dress and appearance. Although I did not have cornrows….there was another sister in my unit who had them….but she got away with it because she wore a wig while on duty. I’m not sure if anyone other than the girls in the barracks even knew. No one in command ever said anything to her about it. I’m not saying that that’s something she should do but she could give it a try. Buy a nice wig to wear while on duty. Take it off when you get home or to the barracks. I would hate to see her cut off her locks. But honestly, it really doesn’t surpise me that the Air Force still continues to make a big deal over something so trivial as the way someone wears their hair especially right now when we are in the middle of a war. Stay strong my sister…..
November 20th, 2007 at 1:57 pm
Kim’s hair looks neat and professional, I hope my comments help her keep this style while serving our country.
November 20th, 2007 at 2:00 pm
Kim is beautiful and young. In 2007, it is indeed a shame that someone, especially our military, can call natural hair “unprofessional.” I wonder how it would be if all naturally straight haired men and women were forced to alter their hair pattern and make it kinky (burning their scalps).
I agree with #16, Michelle, to a degree. I am 54 years old and have been wearing my natural hair with so much pride for the past three years. I put on my lipstick and walk tall among the beautiful, diverse, professional population in the City of Orlando (south). Prior to going all natural, I went though the relaxers and wore long straight hair for far too many years. It is up to me how I am preceived not “them.” We must fight like hell for your rights. This is America for goodness sake!
Nam-myoho-renge-kyo…
November 20th, 2007 at 2:38 pm
Hi
I had the same problem 6 yrs ago when I went to Air Force military training. I was wearing the two strand twist when I was approach that I wasnt suppose to wear that. I continue to wear it and it wasnt brought to my attention anymore. The regulations state it has to be natural color of your complexion. My friend was force to take out her microbraids because their were burgundy in color.
She should fight this and take tis to the IG Inspector General an or MEO becuase I feel like its a prsonal discrimnation from her supervisor vs the military rules and regulation.
November 20th, 2007 at 3:03 pm
Perhaps what Kim needs to do is challenge her superiors’ reasoning for their hair standards.
When I was in the Guard, these white people try to threaten me with expulsion because my waist length extension braids were too “bulky” to fit under a gas mask within the alloted 15 seconds. So I bought a wig, stuffed my braids under it in some ginormous pin curls, and walla! Problem solved. They were pissed, but nothing they could do. The wig was well within regulations. And I was going to be d*mned if I was going take down my hair for two days a month!
Because of this I learned that many of these standards are not necessarily put in place to be discriminatory, but only to make sure the soldier is not hendered from doing their duty. You are a soldier 1st in the military, property of Uncle Sam, and a person maybe 2nd or third. Your uniform, how fast you can don your equipment, even down to the way you eat is dictated by Uncle Sam, and if you don’t like it, don’t join. I know it sucks, but that’s the way it is.
I would suggest Kim wear wig, at least until she finds out how this protest goes.
Funny note…while I was typing this Michele beat me to the punch on the wig idea! lol
November 20th, 2007 at 4:33 pm
Kim’s hair is beautiful. It’s natural! It’s her God given glory. I think it is a disgrace for our authorities to concern themselves with something this small. Our country is in too much trouble with terrorist, illegals, drugs, alcohol, stravation, immorality, homosexuality, and so much more to be so concerned about Kim’s beautiful hair!
November 20th, 2007 at 5:24 pm
YES WE WANT FREEDOM FOR MANY THINGS, BUT THE SAD CASE IS IT WON’T HAPPEN. THIS IS PROBABLY A SIGN FROM GOD TELLING YOUR DAUGHTER TO COME HOME. YES YOU WANT TO FIGHT FOR WHAT IS RIGHT, BUT COME HOME AND BE SAFE.. THINK ABOUT IT AREN’T YOU ALWAYS THINKING ABOUT WHETHER SHE’S GOING TO COME HOME OR NOT.. JUST MY THOUGHT..COME HOME IT MAY BE A GIFT FROM GOD…..
November 20th, 2007 at 5:30 pm
I used to be in the Army in 2003 and there were regulations about hair and dress. I think in general the rule was the hair couldn’t touch or come below the collar of the uniform. So I think as long as the bun in the back stays above the collar she should be left alone. From the pictures shown she looks professional and the issure shouldn’t be whether or not she has dreads but whether or not she can properly wear her uniform and head gear.
November 20th, 2007 at 6:31 pm
This is horrible
November 20th, 2007 at 6:52 pm
There is nothing wrong with Kim’s hair. I used to be in the Army when braids were the hot topic. I remember we had an inspection of the barracks and our SGM, a black man, was all up in this sister’s hair because she had braids. He said they looked dirty and unkempt so she had to take them out. Its sad that so many blacks have this stigma about our hair. If it’s not a “good grade” then its ugly. So we perm it to death to get our hair to look like white hair. Also, a lot of white people have never seen a black person with natural hair. They only think of black hair as dreadlocks, braids or afros. They probably wouldn’t know what a dreadloc looked like if their life depended on it. For that matter, most black people look at a sista strange if she is wearing her hair natural. The military needs to realize black hair doesn’t lay flat unless it has some type of manipulation to make it that way. I will be glad when we realize straightening our hair does not make a black person more acceptable in white society.
November 20th, 2007 at 7:02 pm
Actually this does not surprise me at all.. we still live in the world of prejudice and envy and no matter how hard we try to fight and change things for us a Afro American black . they will put obstacles up making it difficult to cross. Her hair does not determine her skill to perform herduties. If anything, it gives her the freedom to not have to worry if it is in place or not.
November 20th, 2007 at 9:01 pm
when did it become an unnatural state to be natural. not only is her hair natural, but it is also neat,clean and professional looking. fighting for your country she not be about hair anyway.the fact is if it has to be about hair, her style would be more manageable in the field anyway.
November 20th, 2007 at 9:19 pm
Hello,
I don’t know Kim personally, but there is nothing wrong with her hair. She looks to be a clean cu,t professional young lady. She is serving our country and personally, her hair style has nothing to do with it. She is laying her life on the line for this country and all you all can worry about is her hairstyle. It is not coming out from under her hat, it doesn’t have anything crawling from it, so what could be the problem. I have seen many females with there hair coming from under their hat, and have read nothing of this sort.
Honestly, this offends me. I don’t have natural hair, but this is because I chose not to. Kim, I thank you for protecting our country and the people that are trying to give you the discharge should be ashamed of themselves.
November 20th, 2007 at 10:05 pm
As a former civilian employee of the Dept of the Army, I can truly relate to what Kim is going through. I had my locs 10 years and ended up cutting them off because of the ‘atmosphere’ against natural hair. I have a girlfriend in the Air Force whose hair is falling out because of chemicals. She told me personally that any type of natural hairstyle in the Air Force is completely out of the question. So, she suffers and has to wear a wig every day. I think this problem is a reflection of a larger problem in our society. The unwillingness to understand and accept natural black hair styles. We are different and those differences makes us beautiful people of color. We shouldn’t be forced to put chemicals in our hair or straighten our hair if we don’t want too. Kim has a hard choice to make…..stand up for her rights or be dishonorably discharged (which can follow her for the rest of her life). I think we should really circulate this petition and show the Air Force how many people are on Kim’s side.
November 20th, 2007 at 10:16 pm
Just sharing what I sent to my states reps.;
Dear Maryland Representatives,
This letter comes to you regarding a current member of the United States Air Force and her plight to maintain her natural black hair style. Her name is Kim. I am a black professional woman who wears her hair natural as well.
I was quite shocked to find that her ability to do her job and serve her country are being questioned because she chooses to accept the type of hair her creator blessed her with. How dare any establishment decide that the style of anyone’s hair (as long as it is neat and clean) be controlled by anyone other than the owner of that hair.
I am curious, have any of the individuals judging Kim ever had the pleasure of managing natural black hair. It can be a challenge, and there is actually a great deal of effort involved in the maintenance of this young woman’s hair. Certainly she has the option of using a chemical relaxer on her hair, but should she be required to undergo the potential pain and discomfort associated with this experience? Should anyone be allowed to demand that we experience the potential health risks and hair loss that can result? I would also venture to guess that when Kim is on the front line, the last thing on her commanding officer’s mind, is, how can he get someone out there to give the black chick a touch-up. Like it or not, a touch-up would be a requirement for Kim to look neat, orderly and professional in her dress uniform, fatigues, or any other get-up that the military requires of her.
I believe that every ethnic group in this country needs representatives that accepts, and respects what makes us individuals, and makes our cultural differences integral parts of our society. If this is too much to ask for, then so is my vote.
November 21st, 2007 at 12:45 am
It seems to me that to require Kim to change a hair style that is already neat, is a violation of her “Freedom of speach.” When I was in the Military, the only rule about coifure or facial hair was that it be neat.
This goes beyond racial or cultural understanding. Any hair style that is neat is not, and should not be considered, out of uniform.
If Kim is forced out of the Air Force because of the hairdo depicted here I am sure she will have sufficient grounds to sue.
E. Landon Hobgood
November 21st, 2007 at 1:42 am
This is why we need to have more dialogues on slavery!! Teach our children about slavery just like the Jews are taught never to forget the Holocaust! It is only in this way that we can understand all the elements that created slavery and the mental and emotional slavery that we are still in today! There is too much hate and self hate of our race! Thank you Kim for loving yourself! Thank you mama for loving yourself and your daughter! Bless, God is always with us. This too shall pass!
- true Trinbagonian (from Trinidad and Tobago) sister
November 21st, 2007 at 1:43 am
There is nothing wrong with this girl’s hair. I am a black female who served for 9 years in the army. When I first enlisted I was told I could not wear braids but that changed over time. I wore my hair natural (2 strand twists) after giving up on relaxers. I received compliments and negative comments from various individuals. Most of the negativity came from black or non-white colleagues. It is not fair to always blame whites when these issues come up because, unfortunately, many black people out there speak out more against natural hair than others do. Most of the whites I’ve encountered want to know how I achieved the style and ask questions because they don’t know much about my type of hair. It is easier to answer questions from someone who truly wants to know than to listen to someone, who knows exactly what it’s about, bad mouth me and encourage me to “straighten my hair.
I think whoever threatened a dishonorable discharge for this person was being extreme and needs to be educated. Blacks out there who buy into and sell the notion of “good hair” vs. “bad hair” need to wake up and realize that they are not helping the situation when they make such classifications. How many of us grew up feeling inferior in some way because we did not have good hair? Where did we learn that? From our own people.
Come on people be proud of what you have, curly or straight, and teach your kids to love and embrace these differences.
November 21st, 2007 at 3:33 am
Just saw this alert and was really disgusted. I fired off those e-mails to my representatives quick-fast! Hope they’re heard like a shot, along with others sent, in support of Kim and getting rid of these ridiculous military hair regulations which are rooted in racism and ignorance. The way a person wears their hair–as long as it is neat and clean–is a matter of personal expression. For many Black women, keeping our hair healthy means avoiding the use of chemicals and heat to straighten our hair’s super-curly and tightly coiled texture. Whatever the reasons we have for wearing our hair the way we do, however,–natural, straightened or otherwise–is a First Amendment right. Are we in the 21st century or have we gone back in a time before Reason and Enlightenment? Stay strong, Kim. I’m going to pass the word so everyone hears about your story and this disgusting nonsense that is going on in the military. Despite the military mindset of soldiers needing to be cookie-cutter copies of each other, being a soldier in Uncle Sam’s service does not erase the fact that we are diverse people and individuals in our own right. The common thread which holds American soldiers together is the idea that each soldier is there to have his “brother’s” back as they fight in support of the ideals espoused by this country. That should include “And Justice for all!”
November 21st, 2007 at 5:09 am
I am currently in Iraq and I am natural so I wear my hair in cornrows. I see some females with locs that are neat, clean, and pulled back in a bun that is just beautiful. I don’t say a word to them. Many don’t. Those who get harrassed about their hair, get harrassed by those who need to have power over the Soldier or (yes this does happen) a Soldier said no to a “date” and suffers reprisal for the rejection. I think locs should be allowed as long as they meet a standard (ie, a maximum diamater). Everything else goes without saying (clean, neat etc). The reg will eventually change. In the meantime if I were this Airman, I would wear a wig while on duty. That would tick her superiors off but she would be in compliance with the reg. Play the game to win. Do not throw away 7 years and do NOT cut your hair. Play the game to win!!!
November 21st, 2007 at 9:01 am
Wow. I absolutely can’t believe this. It seems to me that since Kim, or any of us for that matter, don’t fit the perception of the US Military, they find ways to retaliate against that. I’m sure if Kim chose to shave her head completely bald they’d have a problem with that as well. Once again, not fitting their perception. As everybody knows it’s a man’s world but moreso than that, it’s a white man’s world and we live in it.
I am also prior Army but was not natural at that time. Now that I am, i’m a Police Officer and I wear my hair twisted and afro’d at times. It seems that my white male counterparts dislike it but nothing in the policy manual is against it. As of now. I wouldn’t be surprise to see it changed in the near future, but for what purpose?
It’s sickening! Just my opinion. Good luck Kim. We’ve got your back!!
November 21st, 2007 at 9:17 am
I think that her hair, in the picture, is neat. However, I find that too many of us are using this style and in the end, they are locs …. dreadlocks … whatever you want to call it. We must say it as it.
Now, The young lady needs to make sure that she understands the regulations … if she is not sure about a particular regulation, she should contact a lawyer. Discrimination is very much alive but we tend to use it as soon as we feel threatened. We must learn to view the case from both sides before coming to a dicession. The armed forces all have rules that we know about before we sign up. Those that we don’t know about are told to us early when we enlist. If the young lady knew that dreadlocks were not accepted, why did she allow her hair to locs? Because, from my view, the end of her hair looks like dreadlocks!
We can wear our hair twisted and not allow it to become locks. I also think that I can see her having problems putting on gear in a quick time. Style is not always worth it! And this seems a waste of fight as we have so many other battles to face in the grand ole’ USA.
November 21st, 2007 at 9:47 am
Many, many thanks to Tywanna and Treasured Locks for bringing this to our attention. A thousand thanks to all the military personnel who have chimed in on the subject, and especially for the elucidating information concerning the actual regulations and education re: safety with regard to helmets and gas masks.
To Kim’s mother, yes, I wish your daughter godspeed home, too! But in the interim, may she find sanctuary in the camaraderie of her brothers and sisters and in the pride of service she gives to her country. We thank you, Kim, and we surround you with love.
Your hair is beautiful, and no doubt your spirit is, too! We enter into prayer, meditation, protest, resistance, persistence, and power on your behalf. Wake up, Uncle Sam, it’s a new day!
Now, I’m off to write my congressional representative!
November 21st, 2007 at 12:09 pm
I am not in the military, but maybe it is because of her “bun”. Maybe the helmet that the military uses will not accomidate the “bun” and so her helmet does not fit properly, thus putting her safety in jeopardy.
Just a thought.
November 21st, 2007 at 2:08 pm
A couple of comments:
1.) The commanders have not said the problem with this style is the “bun”. It’s the fact that her hair is locked.
2.) As far as we know Kim did understand the regulations. But, the regulations were recently changed to exclude “dreadlocks”. Dreadlocks are not defined in the regulation. Kim contends (and we agree) that her hair is locked, not “dreadlocked”. Dreadlocks usually refers to hair that is free-formed by possibly palm rolling and the locks can be thick and unruly. The perception that dreadlocks are dirty and unkempt seems to persist.
3.) We think it’s important to distinguish between regulations that ban “faddish”, unnecessary hair styles and a regulation that bans a style that is not faddish, is professional and neat and is done to actually make natural Black hair more manageable. Regulations like this seem to be either done out of ignorance of the maintenance of Black hair or in an attempt to force women to chemically treat their hair. At one time, cornrows, braids and microbraids were also banned, leaving women with natural hair virtually forced to cut their hair off or perm it. If cornrows, braids and microbraids are acceptable, we just want to ask the question why not neat, well maintained dreadlocks? There is virtually no difference in appearance and there is no difference in how the hair might or might not interfere with safety gear.
November 21st, 2007 at 8:06 pm
Sent to my Senators and Conressman:
This is just extremely strange.
I an White, and for that matter, wear my hair in a braid, so that
I don’t have to think about it when I am working.
This young woman, who is more selfless than most of us will ever be, has chosen a serviceable hairstyle, clearly in order to get on with doing what she has chosen to do FOR HER COUNTRY!
What kind of stupid, racist, sexist agenda calls anyone to pick at her for her PRACTICAL choice of hairstyle???
Grow up, you guys! Think about what these young people are sacrificing for all of us! Would any of you do it?
We sit here at home and be Democrats and Republicans.
They are dying for our politicians!
November 22nd, 2007 at 2:58 pm
Anyone who is not accepted in whatever their choosen field needs to leave.
We have always changed ourselves to fit into other peoples world. It is now time to stop. Time to make a stand.
Trust me when no black person joins up they will soon start recruiting those with locks, twists, weaves etc. But until that day we have no more business bending to them.
We need to overstand things in the 21st century.
This sister would be better off starting up her own business and working for herself and trying to find ways to help her Afrikan family and the wider community. She is getting paid death wages, fighting a loosing cause and all with the job prospects of loosing her life. Go figure.
November 22nd, 2007 at 10:33 pm
I retired from the Army and when I was stationed in Oklahoma in August 2005
in my 24th year my hair had been short down to a buzz cut. I t was not shaved it was clippped with barber clippers. I had very long hair 24 years prior to going into the Army. I marched in President Reagen’s funeral with the same hair cut. Well there was a prejudiced Sergeant Major at the time of my 24 years in the military who followed me to my car in the parking lot and told me that he could not tell if I was a male or a female from the rear because of my hair cut and that my hair cut was not within regulation. The regulation at the time in the Army stated that female hair cut was not to be shaved and not blocked. Shaved for white people is Telly Savalis from Kojack and for Black peopple Michael Jordan’s haircut. I still had hair and it was not bald. The military has some really ignorant people who don’t know how to interpret the regulations and sometime when that occurs it becomes harassment. I had been through the Army all around in and out of the country with the same hair cut. When you have soldiers who are from areas like Iowa that are not use to black people they can be real ignorant
Retired Sergeant First Class
November 23rd, 2007 at 8:54 pm
I’m also black female in the Air Force myself. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the way Kim is wearing her her. It is still neat and professional. There are just so many other problems her command should focus on. If her hair does not affect her duty performance, then what’s the problem?
November 24th, 2007 at 1:47 am
In response to some of the more negative comments about Kim’s hair… I am her friend, and I have helped her and tried to do what I could to find her some help for this issue. We have worked on this issue. We have gone through all the base resources, like Military Equal Opportunity (they couldn’t help), the Chaplain (they couldn’t help), the Legal office and the Area Defense Council. They gave advice, and we are following it. The Inspector General is the next step. The regulation is unclear. That is why we’re fighting it. Kim CAN don her gas mask, chemical mask, war gear (including her helmet) without fail. There’s no reason she should be attacked for her hair. There are thousands of other military members walking around with their hair out of regulations, whether it be in 7 different colors, below the collar in length, or whatever. She is being attacked for simply having locs. The only reason they know that she has locs is when she’s out of uniform, because in uniform, her hair is cornrowed, and very neat in appearance. But her locs are not DREADLOCKS. They are African twists, or African Braids. That’s their title. They are interlocked, but they are not unkempt. She washes her hair religiously, and she keeps her hair less than 3 inches in bulk with her bun in the back. I feel that if the regulation is saying, “Dreadlocks are not authorized” then there should be some clarification. They need to look at her pictures, see that she is neat, clean, groomed. It is possible to look professional with locs, braids, twists, whatever… We, as a people, need to educate people without ethnic hair, so this unnecessary discrimination does not occur again.
November 25th, 2007 at 12:26 am
Awww the Air Force been there done that for 10 years. I just separated in Aug 2007. Prior to that I went through the same exact thing. I started braid locs in 2005. I had them in for a year. Although my people in my squadron had an issue with them they couldn’t do anything because it wasn’t in black and white. As soon as the reg change you can bet your bottom dollar they were on me. It took me a whole month and a half to take them down. I guess some thought it was an overnight process. I had to quickly school them on the fact that my hair had been like this for a whole year and I don’t think that two weeks is enough time. So even then when I did take them down and wore my natural. I still had flack. By my hair being long and think wearing it out in uniform was a definite no. So my usual style was 2 strand twists, box braids, flat twists etc… So my supervisor told me on several occasions that he had been questioned as to whether or not my hair was professional. I told him if ‘they’ thought that by making me take down my locs = me relaxing, then they are sadly mistaken! The military is good in it’s own way but it’s sh!t like this that needs to stop. Meanwhile, we are in a war number one and I’m sure there are more important issues going on in her squadron than her hair! I’m so glad that I got the hell out of dodge! Now I’m happily going on 7 months with my new set of locs and my new job!
For all you natural ladies in the military keep your head up!
Peace
November 25th, 2007 at 4:57 am
This is a beautiful sista with lovely hair,however, I can understand the issue her commanders might have with the “bun” in the back. Like it or not, no one in the U.S. military should expect a “right” to long hair of any type. That is really the only issue here. The locks look good with or without the bun. Thank you for your service and stay strong Kim, but given all that our people are dealing with, I can’t really get upset about you facing the loss of a bun. I hope that you will be safe and that you return home only missing parts that will eventually grow back.
November 25th, 2007 at 1:14 pm
I have been in the USAF for 10 yrs now and I am familiar with what Kim is going through. I’ve been growning my relaxer out for about 8 months now and I love how my hair is growing. I personally keep my hair Microbraided to keep the AF off my back but, Kim’s hair is very neat, clean and professional. I see black females all the time (in uniform) blatantly wearing their hair in a manner where it is simply not a professional image and those girls (in my opinion) make it harder for Kim and other black military women to overcome the hair obstacle. I was recently approached by a white E-7 telling me that all of my braids had to be one color…I had lighter brown highlights in my braids; I couldn’t understand why the regulation was written to say braids had to be all one color but white women can wear their hair in highlights, low lights and frosted which to me is very faddish. It’s a double standard and i feel like this is the AF’s way of singling out one particular race. It’s sad really. Hang in there Kim all of us go through the same sort of discrimination at some point in our military careers and I pray that you’ll be the driving force behind 36-2903 being revised.
November 25th, 2007 at 8:33 pm
hi,my name is marilyn,I THINK HAIR IS VERY NEAT.I DO NOT KNOW MUCH ABOUT MILTARY RULE BUT HER HAIR LOOK VERY NICE
MRS MARILYN BROWN
November 25th, 2007 at 11:32 pm
Greetings to all, and please know that my prayers are with this young lady. Unfortunately what I have to share might rub some of you the wrong way- but know that my intention is to educate and inform and nothing else. When I heard about this I sent my reply to my aunt as such:
> Hey Auntie,
>
> The problem is that the (fashionable) parts in her hair can be considered to be excentric. She was not drafted into the military and knew full well what the rules and regulations were before she joined. AFI 36-2903 is the ruling that states the airman’s hair must be within a specific regulation. Unfortunatly, her hair is not within regs and they can discipline her for it. Her parts can be considered to be fashionable, her braids are too bulky, and her cover (hat) is not on her head properly. Please don’t think that I’m being unsensitive but this is what it is. Are they discriminating? Probably- but did she know what she was getting into and what the rules were before she swore in? Yes. It is said to see another sister going through this; but in my opinion she has pissed the wrong person off (like your’s truly), and now they are going after her. My only suggestion for her is to keep her nose clean, be as unnoticed as possible, and continue to play their
> games. She is an E-5 with a lot of declarations on her chest…she’s been playing the game just fine for a while but now she needs to play smarter. It’s not fair, but it’s a part of life.
>
> With love,
>
> Syl
>
> Your former Air Force E-5
In addition, since I have read some of the comments on this page I would like to add a few more comments:
1. Her hair bulk is questionable on the pictures- and that alone can be a cause of her problems.
2. Lord forbid she is called to action where she would need to where her Chemical Protective Gear, could she actually protect herself and continue to do her primary or contingency duties with her hair the way it is? (It is questionable to me that she could as well).
3. Have her other commanders felt this way in the past, and what is her relationship with the people in her chain of command?
The reason for question number three is, like I previously mentioned, there has to be something else going on that is making this such a hugh deal. I agree that it is not right; but it’s a part of life.
I would like to extend some advise that my (drafted) Vietnam Vet Daddy told me before I left for MEPS: Always remember the rules and why you chose to join the military!! All actions have reactions and/or consequences, so make sure that you are “squared-away” (we have USMC ties as well) at all times, and try to stay at least a mile ahead of them…you are on the same team but you are not their friends.
With this in mind, I want to thank you for serving our country and fighting for our freedom. I think that you look nice; but there are some descrepancies.
Stay blessed and focused,
An Air Force Vet
November 26th, 2007 at 12:16 pm
I just had the time to review my emails, sorry for the late response. I am hurt, angry and feel outraged that at this time and age, we are still experiencing this kind of ignorance in our country, especially, in our military. We are made in Gods image and his likeness. Therefore Kim should not have to perm her hair, for it is her natural beauty. It is time for the rules and the regulations of the military to change. After all, she is serving her country, with her life .I thank God for her and all those who put their lives on the battlefield for me everyday. “Kim” my prayers are with you and this battle. Thank You Treasured Locks for bringing this to my attention.!!!! Sandy
November 26th, 2007 at 1:19 pm
Actually her hair is gorgeous!!! However, I’m not surprised that our military doesn’t necessarily think so. Similarly, corporate America has also enacted certain “regulations” that ban these same types of hairstyles. At some point we need to educate our melanin-deficient brothers and sisters of the importance and history of these natural hairstyles. There must be more than a one-dimensional view of professionalism and beauty in this country. For some reason these hairstyles are associated with negativity - but this needs to change. Thanks for sharing this story.
November 26th, 2007 at 3:31 pm
I am a newly retired AA that served 20 years in the Army. Hair issues have always been a problem with us in the military. It seemed like every year, there was some type of change or updates if you will that unfortunately only affected us. When predominately AA females started getting acrylics (nails), the regulation prevented that by saying your nails could only be like 1 1/4″ long or something to that fact. When we wore our hair braided, the regulation was changed again to adjust the length and the way we styled our braids. The hairstyle could not “alter” the shape of the head-gear (smh). Although MANY AA were given “on-the-spot” corrections for wisps of hair that was touching the back of the color, but I can only count on one hand the countless White females that were never reprimanded if their hair was found hanging from their “scrunches”.
When we dyed our hair, the regulation was changed again to state that our hair had to be the same color as the natural hair color. Of course Auburn is a natural hair color, but we all knew what the regulation was trying to say in a round-about way.
This girl needs to fight for all its worth because this crap has got to stop!!!
US Army Retiree
Fayetteville, NC
November 27th, 2007 at 1:29 am
I have read most of the commentaries and I must say that I agree that this is absolutely absurd! Kim’s hair looks beautiful and not to mention, extremely neat and professional looking. I am a sister who wears her hair natural. I decided last summer to cut my nearly two foot “relaxed” hair last summer because I wanted to be free of chemicals. Of course, that shocked alot of people because we live in a society that embraces what seems to be one standard of beauty…..you all know who and what I am talking about. It just amazes me how ignorant and closed-minded some individuals can be. This young woman, Kim, is serving and protecting our country and yet she has to contend with superiors who apparently have nothing else important to do. What I have a difficult time trying to understand is why the Air Force/ Military considers natural black hair/hairstyles “faddish”? Why should she have to wear a wig or “chemically” straighten her hair. I’m not quite sure what that has to do with her fighting for our country. I simply view Kim’s hairstyle as a symbol of pride in who she is as a BEAUTIFUL AFRICAN-AMERICAN woman. Kim, continue to hold your head high and continue to make US proud.
November 27th, 2007 at 1:37 pm
I have spent about a good hour or so reading every single post regarding Kim’s hair. I must say I love all the support that she is getting but at the same time I do not necessarily agree with some of the other comments. I am one of U.ncle S.am’s A.ction F.igures and have been enlisted for 8yrs.I have received numerous awards and have never recieved a bad rating, I can also bust out my PT test with no problems. I have served my time in Iraq, getting attacked day in and day out. I have volunteered to go back for the sake of people with children or people who were married would not have to, being as though I am single. I wore the perm look, but one day came to my senses when I realized if God wanted me to have straight hair, I would have came out that way. And I knew it was time to let go of the perm when I noticed other African American females who’s hair was falling out becuase of these chemicals.
I have been growing my “LOCS” proudly for 4yrs, and it is very strong and healthy. Let me definitely put it out there for the people coming at Kim about what she “signed up for.” The same oath that Kim took, me, Jai, and several others took the exact same oath. This change to the regulation is something that has JUST happened a year ago, so you can not say she “knew what she signed up for.” Prior to this reg, locs WERE allowed and Kim along with the rest of us were and have stayed within the regs and have served this country proudly. And when we discuss the wear of safety gear, to this day, I can personally throw my gas mask on QUICKER than a person with a “perm” or a white female with straight hair, and even quicker than a male with a bald head and have an effective “SEAL”. I have no problems with the wear of my cover(hat).
When in Iraq, I had no issues when it came to the fit of my helmet and I wore that thing religiously! I currently wear my locs in the same fashion as Kim. I might have been one of the more lucky ones who has not had anything said to them, and thats maybe becuase my command has more other things to care about than my hair, and the other fact that I am at a more “laid back” base, and the fact that I am not a “dirtbag” might play its part as well. When in uniform, my hair is neat and professional. I also care for my hair religiously so “appearance” has never been an issue. I also get my hair mistaken for braids until a person is right in my face. Recently I deployed to an Army base, and was approached yesterday about my hair when walking into the BX. Below is how that conversation went:
A male Sgt Major approaches me right before I walk in the door, and says “Since when does the AF allow dreadlocks.” Keep in mind my hair is neatly pulled back into a ponytail, not exceeding the bulk inches, and is well above my collar, and my cover(hat) fits perfectly on my head. Then he goes on to say that he thinks dreads are very TACKY, and for me to have them is a TACKY look and he doesn’t like it regardless if I am an “Airman, Troop, or Soldier.” I think the part that made me want to punch him in his throat is the fact this was coming from an African American Male, Sgt Major(E9). Then the look on his face was of pure disgust, like I stole his wallet or something. But hey I guess you gotta make your a name for yourself to stand out in this “Good Ol Boy” military and earn rank.
The point of me sharing that is his attitude and some of the attitudes from the post regarding Kim is another reason why “WE” remain a target. We are suppose to stand up for each other as a race, but yet your OWN race is “BRAINWASHED.” I can almost bet that it is not strictly white people sitting up in those offices making changes to the regs. Since I have been on this Army installation I have received numerous compliments regarding my hair from Army females, and how they want to wear their hair in the same manner, but are forced to “GET IN STEP” whether its with perms or a fade. Anytime we as a race do something, it is automatically judged, but yet we are the most imitated race, but still the most hated. The part I don’t get and will never get is…the same people that make these regs, do they question the white girls that walk around with dayum near purple hair, or hair with 5 different highlight colors…are they stopped and asked the same questions that we are asked? HIGHLY DOUBT IT. I will let this be known, I will get paperwork out the ass and seperate out of the military before I cut my hair off.
I am also working every angle on what can be done to change this reg. Just like with afros and braids, over time it will be changed, and the ignorant MIGHT get educated, but the looks will still be giving because its like a sin to have NATURAL hair, but there will be no changes unless we can receive some support from you all that log on to this website. So much respect to Kim, and even more respect to my sister Jai who had to compromise herself and cut off her strength. Any help you guys can give will be much appreciated!
November 28th, 2007 at 12:56 am
I don’t see what the problem is with this sista’s hair. It looks very clean and professional to me. However, the military thrives on ’sameness’ within their ranks. If everyone were to ‘be themselves’, the cohesiveness of the military would be in jeopardy. So while I want this sista to fight the regulation, I also know that the military was not formed with non-white people in mind. This is one of the issues that you have to deal with.
November 28th, 2007 at 1:09 am
I’d like to respond to syl’s comments (59). While it was well thought out, all of that person’s comments are opinion based on ignorance of the subject, but I still respect my vet. As I am about to be one myself.
I’m in a similar situation to Kim. I came into the military with relaxed hair. 2 years after that i went natural and a year or so after that i started my locs. for the past 3 years after that i had locs that everyone liked, and never came into question. 9 months after i re-enlisted overseas the regulations changed saying that dreadlocks were not allowed. so, i did not enlist, or re-enlist under those regulations. i signed under the dotted line to protect and serve my county, not to be discriminated against because I was excepted one day, and the next day I was shunned!
and by the way, i am able to properly dawn my gas mask in appx 6 seconds (well under the 9 seconds that is required). You know how I know? Because I have been instructed to don my gas mask in front of my squadron by a women who’s hair NEVER came into question, but it took her 15 seconds to get all those loose, 5 different colored blonds streaks in to her gas mask properly.
my helmet fits without flaw. you know how I know, because if never fell off when I was in the AOR doing my job in the field. It’s never came off or hung low to the side while participating in numerous exercises where I had to have it on for 12 hours at a time…and so does my BDU, and blues hat.
the bulk of my hair HAS been measured upon request…and does not exceed more than 3 inches in bulk.
I don’t dare ask were your rations comes from and your opinion is yours to keep. .. I too, am battling this regulation, not for my career alone…but to bring to light that women…no, BLACK WOMEN are still being discriminated against.. When I say that how does it make you feel? doesn’t matter what color or sex you are, but how does that make YOU FEEL? Me, I feel hurt, and enraged at the same time to know that it is 2007 and WE are still “not equal“ if we choose to keep our black identities…I‘m not just talking about dreadlocks…afros, micros, cornrows, plaits, braids have all at different time historically been attacked by military regulations. Do you seed a trend SYL and all other readers…but you know what, change gonna come…rather it’s me, it will be someone or something else that should spark a collective voice of people saying no and taking a stand. Growing up in the south, I can count how many time i have crossed racism in my life…i have never backed down from it and wont back down from it now.
i am just as qualified to serve my country as the next and my “hair” only comes into question because of what it signifies…i’m not trying to be something i’m not, CUZ BLACK IS BEAUTIFUL…
[name withheld by request]
November 28th, 2007 at 3:14 am
Way to go girl!!!! And as for those people trying to bring a negative spin on what you doin’…Let the haters will hate! Besides these streets were paved on the back of uncle tom’s too. I’m a vet too and just wanted to let you know that I’m glad a young black girl like yourself see’s that change needs to happen in this situation, and atleast you tryin’a doin’ it! Keep your head up.
Jah
November 28th, 2007 at 9:26 am
I’m not sure what the policy is on your hair but if it does not directly say you can’t wear braids, then you have a case. I am in the Marine Corps and our policy states no locks or twist, or anything that your commander considers eccentric. I feel for you, and I hope you win your case.
November 28th, 2007 at 11:27 am
Kim’s hair is neat and professional period. This woman is serving our country and they are more concerned about her hairstyle, which is gorgeous.
November 28th, 2007 at 1:01 pm
i work for the state of misery (missouri) dept of corrections and it has come to my attention that they also have some policies as to not wearing natural black hair. i am a young black male growing my locks and ill be damed if anybody tell me to cut or do anything different with my hair. this is me. if you dont like it….move along. im not goinjg to let anybody tell me what i can and cant do with my hair. if i want to wear it naturally nappy thats my perogative. no job or career is going to make me into anyttihng i am not. im black and proud and i wouldnt change that for the world. i know who i am and what i want and thats all part of standing up for what you believe in which is you.
-i live for the love of all my black people
lavelle thomas- gamefacemuzikinc@yahoo.com
November 28th, 2007 at 3:22 pm
This is rediculous! This sisters hair looks more neat/professional the most relaxed hair styles. Not only is it tastefully done/pulled back it very becoming of her, which is where the real issue lies. Her hair looks no different then when I white woman in uniform is expected to pull her hair back in a bun. As long as you can get your hat on (cornrows, extentions, dread locs, or nappy fro that has been braided/plated) there should be absolutely no issues/question. In defense of the Marine Corp, there are not enough sisters wearing there hair in its natural state. This is why the sisters experiencing resistance.
November 28th, 2007 at 4:38 pm
First of all, I want to commend the young lady for not taking it lying down. Legally, the military cannot give her a dishonorable discharge for her hair. And according to military regulations, as long as it is above her collar, she is within code. Now since cornrows are allowed, I would like for them to explain why it is she cannot keep them. I would also like to suggest that she talk to the JAG office and see what recourse she has. As for the person who says we should stay out of things we do not understand or know about, I black, female and former military. Trust me I know.
November 28th, 2007 at 6:56 pm
Good afternoon,
Currently I am partisipating in the Never Again Volunteer Yourself program for about 7+ yrs. And every hairstyle that I looked up in regulations and tried to stay accordandly in, my commands have said something about. I got off the relaxed bandwagon about 2 1/2 yrs ago, and am wearing my natural hair texture. I have ensured that its way above my collar, that the bulk is less than two inches and that it looks professional. Of course there is always one hater, so I get talked to. So, I do feel your pain Kim. I can see maybe where they could say something about the parts appearing ziz zagged. But it is due to you having LOCKS and not DREADLOCKS. What I honestly don’t understand is that why shouldn’t they ” Grandfather ” your situation. And how dare they allow cornrolls but not locks? I know too many people (enlisted wise) that had locks in the Navy, and was forced to cut their crown of glory. With me, I can’t even come into the command with a different hair color (of course complementing my skin tone) and someone has something to say. And nothing against caucasion women, but they come with three different streaked hair color and no one says anything to them. The Armed Forces really needs to get it together. Now I am not saying accept every type of hair style known to man. We are repesentitves for the US Goverment. But, look how long it took for them to accept cornrolls-and certain people still question them. I refuse to chemically relax my hair or press and comb it just for it to curl right back up after PT!!! If your hair was a REAL issue, then they should of said something when you were growing it yrs ago. Yes the ban wasn’t in effect, but someone higher up always knows when a change is in the mist. Not too sure how the other branches do it, but for Navy-its all about perception. What one person thinks is faddish, someone else finds it in regs.